Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> VIRTUAL COCKPIT e MADDOG 2008
delta_03
post 16/12/2008, 18:34
Post #121


100<200 posts
****

Group: Member
Posts: 124
Joined: 28/10/06
Member No.: 1505



QUOTE (Davide @ 12/12/2008, 15:42) *
FLY THE MADDOG 2008 PROFESSIONAL
La versione Professional include le seguenti funzionalità:
- Gestione dei sistemi inoperative e MELs
- Versione cockpit con FMS Canadian Marconi e PMS (Performance Management System)
- Versione cockpit con strumenti motore e annunciator panel analogici
- Versione dei pannelli 2D Wide (aspect ratio 1.6 per schermi panoramici).


semplicemente eccellente, bravi ..line up and wait.....ciao delta_03 thumbsup.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EadWeard7
post 18/12/2008, 1:23
Post #122


0<10 posts
*

Group: Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 18/12/08
Member No.: 5637



QUOTE (Davide @ 28/05/2008, 22:36) *
Il Virtual Cockpit prende finalmente vita! Pensiamo di rilasciarlo entro la fine di giugno anche se non c’è ancora una data ufficiale.

Il VC sarà completamente in 3d, ogni interruttore, pomello, ago, sarà modellato e animato, ed i display digitali e gli schermi sono disegnati utilizzando le GDI+.

Il Frame Rate è molto buono, sicuramente migliore del pannello 2d.

Come promesso il VC sarà rilasciato gratuitamente per gli utenti che avranno acquistato il Maddog alla data di rilascio.

Contemporaneamente al VC stiamo lavorando ad una nuova versione del Maddog, che verrà rilasciata dopo il VC, e tra le altre cose includerà:

- miglioramenti nella simulazione dei sistemi
- nuovo generatore di avarie con gestione dei sistemi inoperative in accordanza con le MELs
- DUE nuove versioni del cockpit:
1) EFIS con GPS Canadian Marconi e PMS
2) EFIS con pannello motori analogici e OAP
- Tutte le versioni avranno il VC.


Grandissimo Davide!
Sono Edoardo della scuola! Non vediamo l'ora che esca! thumbsup.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gianluca
post 18/12/2008, 16:39
Post #123


10<50 posts
**

Group: Member
Posts: 40
Joined: 27/08/07
Member No.: 3158



Ciao Fabio,grazie per la specifica;io intendevo una versione "completamente" analogica,intendo dire anche con l'Orizzonte Artificiale e l'HSI analogici che erano in uso sui primi esemplari dell'80;quella che uscirà se non ho capito male avrà l'annunciator e gli strumenti motore analogici,ma manterrà il ND ed il PFD digitali,per questo volevo avere una risposta,o dallo Staff o da qualcuno che abbia quest'informazione.
Grazie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mnarducci
post 18/12/2008, 20:00
Post #124


50<100 posts
***

Group: Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 15/07/06
Member No.: 957



QUOTE (gianluca @ 18/12/2008, 16:39) *
Ciao Fabio,grazie per la specifica;io intendevo una versione "completamente" analogica,intendo dire anche con l'Orizzonte Artificiale e l'HSI analogici che erano in uso sui primi esemplari dell'80;quella che uscirà se non ho capito male avrà l'annunciator e gli strumenti motore analogici,ma manterrà il ND ed il PFD digitali,per questo volevo avere una risposta,o dallo Staff o da qualcuno che abbia quest'informazione.
Grazie

Avevo fatto la stessa domanda e Emanuele mi ha così risposto:"QUOTE (mnarducci @ 01/06/2008, 11:33)
Salve,
nella versione analogica del maddog HSI e ADI saranno anch'essi analogici?


Per adesso no, lasciamo EHSI e EADI.
Chissà in futuro.

Il problema è che le versioni full analogiche hanno anche notevoli differenze nel funzionamento dei DFGCs, non è così semplice.
Tanto per divertirsi ce n'è abbastanza credo...

Emanuele

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elifly
post 24/02/2009, 15:54
Post #125


10<50 posts
**

Group: Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 21/03/06
Member No.: 21




....buongiorno ...lo so lo so....dite pure che sono vecchio e rimbambito
ma credo di essere l'unico che nn riesce a vedere il VC......
ho FS9 ...il maddog 2008 pro...spunto la voce VC sul manager setup
pilot position CM3......ma io continuo a vedere il solito pannello....
dovrei vederlo...come appare quì...prima di entrare nel forum vero ?
cos'è....che tralascio di fare ??.....grazie x i suggerimenti..............
................................................................................
Giuliano
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
saimeng
post 03/05/2009, 3:57
Post #126


0<10 posts
*

Group: Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 03/05/09
Member No.: 6176



sweet love taboo

 It’s not easy to have a great relationship with your boy/girlfriend, partner, or spouse. But it’s not impossible, either — it takes some work, of course, but it’s work, work that’s a joy when everything comes together.

  A lot of times, though, the work isn’t enough. We get in our own way with ideas and attitudes about relationships that are not only wrong, but often work to undermine our relationships no matter how hard we work at it.

  I’ve watched a lot of breakups (some of them my own). I’ve seen dramatic flare-ups and drawn-out slow fades, and I’ve tried to pay attention to what seems to be going on. Here are a few of the things I’ve seen that cause people to destroy their own relationships.

  1. You’re playing to win

  One of the deadliest killers of relationships is the competitive urge. I don’t mean competition in the sense that you can’t stand to lose at tennis, I mean the attitude that the relationship itself is a kind of game that you’re tying to win. People in competitive relationships are always looking for an advantage, the upper hand, some edge they can hold over their partner’s head. If you feel that there are things you can’t tell your partner because she or he will use it against you, you’re in a competitive relationship — but not for long.wow gold,

  2. You don’t trust

  There are two aspects of trust that are important in relationships. One is trusting your partner enough to know that s/he won’t cheat on you or otherwise hurt you — and to know that he or she trusts you that way, too. The other is trusting them enough to know they won’t leave you or stop loving you no matter what you do or say. The second that level of trust is gone, whether because one of you takes advantage of that trust and does something horrible or because one of you thinks the other has, the relationship is over — even if it takes 10 more years for you to break up.

  3. You don’t talk

  Too many people hold their tongues about things that bother or upset them in their relationship, either because they don’t want to hurt their partner, or because they’re trying to win. (See #1 above; example: “If you don’t know why I’m mad, I’m certainly not going to tell you!”) While this might make things easier in the short term, in the long run it gradually erodes the foundation of the relationship away. Little issues grow into bigger and bigger problems — problems that don’t get fixed because your partner is blissfully unaware, or worse, is totally aware of them but thinks they don’t really bother you. Ultimately, keeping quiet reflects a lack of trust — and, as I said that’s the death of a relationship.

  4. You don’t listen

  Listening — really listening — is hard. It’s normal to want to defend ourselves when we hear something that seems like criticism, so instead of really hearing someone out, we interrupt to explain or excuse ourselves, or we turn inward to prepare our defense. But your partner deserves your active listening. S/he even deserves you to hear the between-the-lines content of daily chit-chat, to suss out his/her dreams and desires when even s/he doesn’t even know exactly what they are. If you can’t listen that way, at least to the person you love, there’s a problem.

  5. You spend like a single person

  This was a hard lesson for me to learn — until it broke up a 7-year relationship. When you’re single, you can buy whatever you want, whenever you want, with little regard for the future. It’s not necessarily wise, but you’re the only one who has to pay the consequences. When you are with someone in a long-term relationship, that is no longer a possibility. Your partner — and your children, if there are or will be any — will have to bear the brunt of your spending, so you’d better get in the habit of taking care of household necessities first and then, if there’s anything left over, of discussing with your partner the best way to use it.

  This is an increasing problem these days, because more and more people are opting to keep their finances separate, even when they’re married. There’s nothing wrong with that kind of arrangement in and of itself, but it demands more communication and involvement between the partners, not less. If you’re spending money as if it was your money and nobody else has a right to tell you what to do with it, your relationship is doomed.wow gold,

  6. You’re afraid of breaking up

  Nobody in a truly happy partnership is afraid of breaking up. If you are, that’s a big warning sign that something’s wrong. But often, what’s wrong is the fear itself. Not only does it betray a lack of trust, but it shows a lack of self-confidence and self-esteem — you’re afraid that there’s no good reason for someone to want to be with you, and that sooner or later your partner will “wise up” and take off. So you pour more energy into keeping up the appearance of a happy relationships than you do into building yourself up as a person. Quite frankly, this isn’t going to be very satisfying for you, and it also isn’t going to be very satisfying for your partner.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wenzi110
post 16/05/2009, 9:13
Post #127


0<10 posts
*

Group: Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 16/05/09
Member No.: 6227



"I was born in I856 in Kalamakee, Mich., of honest and reputable parents, one of whom Heaven has mercifully spared to comfort me in my later years. In I867 the family came to California and settled near ###### Head, where my father
wow power leveling opened a road agency and prospered beyond the dreams of avarice. He was a reticent, saturnine man then, though his increasing years have now somewhat relaxed the austerity of his disposition, and I believe that nothing but his memory of the sad event for which I am now on trial prevents him from manifesting a genuine hilarity.

"Four years after we had set up the road agency an itinerant preacher came along, and having no other way wow power leveling to pay for the night's lodging that we gave him, favored us with an exhortation of such power that, praise God, we were all converted to religion. My father at once sent for his brother the Hon. William Ridley of Stockton, and on his arrival turned over the agency to him, charging him nothing for the franchise nor plant - the latter consisting of a Winchester rifle, a sawed-off shotgun, and an assortment of masks made out of flour sacks. The family then moved to Ghost Rock and opened a dance house. It was called 'The Saints' Rest Hurdy-Gurdy,' and the proceedings each night began with prayer. It was there that my now sainted mother, by her grace in the dance, acquired the sobriquet of 'The Bucking Walrus.'

"In the fall of '75 I had occasion to visit Coyote, on the road to Mahala, and took the stage at Ghost Rock. There were four other passengers. About three miles beyond ###### Head, persons whom I identified as my Uncle William and his two sons held up the stage. Finding nothing in the express box, they went through the passengers. I acted a most honorable part in the affair,
world of warcraft power leveling placing myself in line with the others, holding up my hands and permitting myself to be deprived of forty dollars and a gold watch. From my behavior no one could have suspected that I knew the gentlemen who gave the entertainment. A few days later, when I went to ###### Head and asked for the return of my money and watch my uncle and cousins swore they knew nothing of the matter, and they affected a belief that my father and I had done the job ourselves in dishonest violation of commercial good faith. Uncle William even threatened to retaliate by starting an opposition dance house at Ghost Rock.
world of warcraft power leveling
As 'The Saints' Rest' had become rather unpopular, I saw that this would assuredly ruin it and prove a paying enterprise, so I told my uncle that I was willing to overlook the past if he would take me into the scheme and keep the partnership a secret from my father. This fair offer he rejected, and I then perceived that it would be better and more satisfactory if he were dead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gianluca
post 25/09/2009, 14:54
Post #128


10<50 posts
**

Group: Member
Posts: 40
Joined: 27/08/07
Member No.: 3158



Salve a tutti, volevo domandare allo Staff se ci sarà la possibilità di avere una versione completamente analogica del MADDOG, grazie.

Gianluca
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Francesco Tomass...
post 02/10/2009, 13:44
Post #129


100<200 posts
****

Group: Member
Posts: 135
Joined: 10/02/07
Member No.: 2020



QUOTE (JimmyDJ @ 29/05/2008, 12:45) *
Grandi ragazzi thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif
Non si puo assolutamente mettere in discussione la vostra serietà e professionalità

Sinceri complimenti ed attendiamo la release. yes.gif




Mah!!,sarà..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JimmyDJ
post 14/10/2009, 12:03
Post #130


50<100 posts
***

Group: Member
Posts: 62
Joined: 22/09/06
From: Trieste - Italy
Member No.: 1313
Callsign: I2404



QUOTE (Francesco Tomassone @ 02/10/2009, 14:44) *
QUOTE (JimmyDJ @ 29/05/2008, 12:45) *
Grandi ragazzi thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif
Non si puo assolutamente mettere in discussione la vostra serietà e professionalità

Sinceri complimenti ed attendiamo la release. yes.gif




Mah!!,sarà..


Alla luce di oggi e di tutte le peripezie lo dico pure io....... ranting.gif e mi auto-'s'quoto sad.gif


--------------------
Ciao, Diego.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gianluca
post 07/12/2009, 21:42
Post #131


10<50 posts
**

Group: Member
Posts: 40
Joined: 27/08/07
Member No.: 3158



Davide, puoi dirci in linea di massima quando potrà essere pronta la versione completamente analogica del pannello? Grazie
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alex37
post 16/02/2010, 13:28
Post #132


0<10 posts
*

Group: Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 28/04/07
Member No.: 2568



Buongorno Davide,

scusa la domanda, ho comprato il maddog2006 a Forlì` c`e' la possibilità di avere l'upgrade al 2008,già che ho letto che e` gratuito l'upgrade al 2008 standard,pero immagino che è per quelli che lo hanno scaricato direttamente dalla web.?


Saluti

Alessandro Marino

marinoalessandro@hotmail.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maxrob
post 17/03/2010, 10:04
Post #133


0<10 posts
*

Group: Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 30/12/07
Member No.: 3593



Salve a Tutti! yes.gif

Scusate se vado un po' Off Topic, ma mi preme comunicarvi le mie idee, in vista di futuri sviluppi!
Spero di non annoiare chi leggerà. Sono customer sia del Maddog 2006, che della versione completa del Maddog 2008 PRO, ma per motivi di tempo non seguo molto questo Forum.

Vorrei dare alcuni spunti, personali, ad eventuali sviluppi futuri:

VERSIONE ANALOGICA – non ricordo, è già compresa nel Maddog 2008 PRO. Vero? Suggerirei una versione completamente analogica, tipo alcuni modelli della Spanair, con EFIS Navigation Display ed FMC.

MANUALISTICA – non sono per nulla soddisfatto dell’attuale divisione in Vol. 1 e 2 (troppo tecnici) e Tutorial di difficile interpretazione per il neofita, non essendo data una panoramica di dove si trovano i vari comandi esposti in dettaglio nelle immagini.
Ottimo compenso il capolavoro di Massimo Solimbergo payware, frutto di un anno di studio, in circa 120 pagine! “MD80 Mc Donell Douglas Training Guide”.

TRAINING – avrebbe potuto essere un buon spunto ispirarsi allo spirito Coolsky, con corso interattivo e situazioni preassemblate.

PROCEDURE e CHECK LIST – anche il recente FS2Crew Voice Commander, non ha risolto la mancata interazione. Mi spiego meglio. Se ad un certo punto viene detto fatto un controllo od eseguita una azione, MA INVECE NULLA E’ STATO FATTO, MA SOLO DETTO FATTO, il flusso prosegue ugualmente.
Ho interpellato lo sviluppatore Bryan Young, il quale mi ha detto che la causa di questa limitazione, sta, nell’impossibilità, da parte sua, di accedrre ai codici di programmazione del Maddog 2008 Pro.
Invero, le uniche Check Lists interattive, con tanto di procedure normali, sono state curate dalla Feelthere, per alcuni prodotti Wilco, tra cui l’ Airbus Vol. 1, con un manualetto ben curato, che spiega “dove” si trovino i vari items da controllare o su cui agire. Questo stato dell’arte è tuttora insuperato. Sono state intitolate “Call!” ...

Idea thumbsup.gif : perché non rivolgersi alla Feelthere per la creazione di tali procedure per il Maddog 2008? Qui se l’azione od il controllo non vengono effettuati con esito positivo, il flusso si ferma, sino a che la situazione non viene corretta.

Dunque, mi piacerebbe vedere un Maddog by Leonardo, come nuovo prodotto, con una manualistica e training interattivo, e check lists in stile Feelthere, magari tutto analogico tranne EFIS ND ed FMC!

Ma poi, sebbene mi renda conto che è facile suggerire, e difficile realizzare, perché non mettere la professionalità della Leonardo, alla ricerca di un realistico progetto di Airbus A320, che tuttora non esiste?
Certo oggi non c’è da rendersi ricchi con Add-Ons per FS, ma sono sicuro che la passione e la bravura del Team Leonardo SH, potrebbe raccogliere grandi riconoscimenti con tali progetti!


Un caro saluto hi.gif !

Massimo ROBERTO (Torino)

www.alitaliavirtual.com member AZA1010

This post has been edited by maxrob: 17/03/2010, 10:14
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Federico Lampis
post 31/05/2010, 20:03
Post #134


10<50 posts
**

Group: Member
Posts: 13
Joined: 09/09/09
Member No.: 6592
Callsign: IG3819



Ciao a tutti,
mi chiedevo se c'è, anche solo lontanamente, l'idea di fare il VC alle altre versioni del pannello...

Moltissimi simmer, con la diffusione del TrackIR volano ormai solo con il Virtual Cockpit e sono stati costretti (come me) a comprare il Maddog standard per non sprecare i soldi in alcune versioni del 2D (bellissime, nulla da dire) che non userebbero.



Con estrema fiducia thumbsup.gif , Federico.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Federico Lampis
post 06/06/2010, 9:43
Post #135


10<50 posts
**

Group: Member
Posts: 13
Joined: 09/09/09
Member No.: 6592
Callsign: IG3819



QUOTE (Federico Lampis @ 31/05/2010, 21:03) *
Ciao a tutti,
mi chiedevo se c'è, anche solo lontanamente, l'idea di fare il VC alle altre versioni del pannello...

Moltissimi simmer, con la diffusione del TrackIR volano ormai solo con il Virtual Cockpit e sono stati costretti (come me) a comprare il Maddog standard per non sprecare i soldi in alcune versioni del 2D (bellissime, nulla da dire) che non userebbero.



Con estrema fiducia thumbsup.gif , Federico.



Basta scrivere si o no eh... thumbsup.gif wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 07/09/10 - 2:05